Let's imagine a worst-case scenario where the United States, through internal factors, disintegrates and splinters. As a result, different states and regions band together to form new nations. One natural fit would be for the people of the "Mormon Belt" to form an alliance and create a new nation, let's call it Deseret.
Now imagine a choice between creating a democracy, similar to the one established in the Constitution, and a theocracy where the prophet was the head of state, similar to the institutions created by Joseph Smith and Brigham Young. Which would you choose? I'm not sure that is such an easy choice for Mormons.
Now, how does this effect your views on the revolutions taking place in the Middle East? There is considerable hand-wringing by conservatives, given voice by Fox News, and hilariously parodied by Glenn Beck, that the revolutions are distinctly bad because Islamists may take power. After all, Palestinians elected Hamas and in Egypt the Muslim Brotherhood has some amount of popularity and political organization. It is certainly not a perfect analogy, but how critical can we be of Muslims choosing to create a theocracy when we, as Mormons, would likely be inclined to do the same?
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar